This past week, Elie Mystal of Above the Law wrote a biting and brilliant article about Dean Berman’s announcement that he intended to make the law school at Arizona State University less reliant on state funding. Berman’s plan went from intriguing to horrifying when he said that he planned to do this by increasing the size of the law school student body and increasing tuition.
Mystal was on the right path when he said Berman’s plan would result in more unemployed lawyers with mountains of debt. What he doesn’t realize is that ASU is already passed the capacity of its current facilities. Where are they going to put another 30 people? Furthermore, job prospects for law graduates in Arizona currently suck in this economy. Is it ethical to flood the market with lawyers who can’t get jobs?
I can understand Berman’s desire to be less reliant to state funding. I’m sure some of his plans were derailed when the state budget for education was slashed. I understand and generally respect the concept that people should pay top dollar for quality products. However, asking students at a public university to carry this burden is asking too much. And pissing off future alums by robbing them blind won’t help the school’s fundraising efforts.
In the National Law Journal, Berman said, “We’re expanding the scope of legal education.” Is he referring to the cubic buttload of clinics, journals, and programs that have been added to the school since he became the dean? Being a student at ASU Law, it seems like a new program is added every 30 seconds. It seems like every time someone mentions the idea of starting something new at the school, Berman approves it. I’ve been wondering where the school was getting the money to pay for all this. I don’t know where it was coming from but now we know who will be footing the bill in the future – the students! If the students are paying for everything, the school shouldn’t be expanding. It should be focusing on doing a few things well – like preparing students to be actual lawyers with real lawyering skills.
Now, I take my fair share of flack for dissing my school while I’m still a student. I’m not saying everything about it is bad – there are some awesome people at the school. But from an administrative perspective, the school doesn’t seem to care about its students. The most glaring proof of this are the decisions that are made to impress and entice potential students, but have limited usefulness to current students. Have you seen the new website? How about the new fancy desks that aren’t big enough to comfortably accommodate a laptop? Or the classroom configurations that are a pain in the ass to navigate? How many students were consulted before these decisions were made? One current professor said probably zero. There’s a lot of flash and sparkle without much utility.
You know what bothers me the most about Berman’s plan? At a recent town hall meeting, Berman said, “”I never would have come if I knew they were going to privatize the law school.” I know he said this because, (1) I was there, and (2) I immediately tweeted that quote out to the universe. (Isn’t technology a bitch?) If the dean of my law school is a walking contradiction, I’m pissed about how this institution is treating its students and severely concerned for its future.
- Law School Tuition Climbs Despite Legal Recession (usnews.com)
- Arizona State Law School Moving Towards Private Funding Model: Prepare to be Gouged, ASU Law Students (abovethelaw.com)
- At Least One Person at the ABA Is Aware That New Law Schools Make No Sense (abovethelaw.com)
- The Princeton Review Law School Rankings are Out. Find A Category to Make Your School Look Awesome. (abovethelaw.com)